Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods Research

By Harry Torrance. 2012

413 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Over the past 10 years or so the “Field” of “Mixed Methods Research” (MMR) has increasingly been exerting itself as something separate, novel, and significant, with some advocates claiming paradigmatic status. Triangulation is an important component of mixed methods designs. Triangulation has its origins in attempts to validate research findings by generating and comparing different sorts of data, and different respondents’ perspectives, on the topic under investigation. Respondent validation has sometimes been included in such processes, but it is an element that has not attracted significant attention from the MMR community. The article argues that attention to respondent validation is a significant issue for methodological debate and that it should be an important aspect of the development of democratic participation in MMR.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4243f33b47125c64dac57857882752cfd23d7cf9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

  1. D. Cavers
  2. C. Campbell
  3. S. Scott
  4. Scott F. Turner
  5. Laura B. Cardinal
  6. Richard M. Burton
  7. Fiona M. Walter
  8. L. Birt

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. D. Cavers
  2. C. Campbell
  3. S. Scott
  4. Scott F. Turner
  5. Laura B. Cardinal
  6. Richard M. Burton
  7. Fiona M. Walter
  8. L. Birt

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. D. Cavers
  2. C. Campbell
  3. S. Scott
  4. Scott F. Turner
  5. Laura B. Cardinal
  6. Richard M. Burton
  7. Fiona M. Walter
  8. L. Birt

Citations in the corpus