Member Checking
By L. Birt, S. Scott, D. Cavers, C. Campbell, Fiona M. Walter. Qualitative Health Research, 2016
2,805 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aba4dd00b2628da5047b034ffa48cc994c1bbcc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kerry R. McGannon
- Kelsey Kendellen
- Christine A. Gonsalves
- R. Kahlke
- F. Olmos-Vega
- Lara Varpio
- Brett W. Smith
- R. Stalmeijer
Citations in the corpus
- An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic (2021, methodology): “Following a member– check procedure (Birt et al., 2016), a synthesis of the results was presented to eight interviewees that were available for this follow-up.”
- Qualitative research in six sport and exercise psychology journals between 2010 and 2017: An updated and expanded review of trends and interpretations (2019, background): “As with the case of inter-rater reliability, much of the wide-spread use of member checking is predicated on a narrow or outdated view of reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry (Birt et al., 2016).”
- A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149 (2022, background): “Such processes can involve sending participants the raw data and/or researcher interpretations for collaboration and feedback (Birt et al. 2016), or booking follow-up interviews or focus groups to allow participants to respond to results.”