Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse

1,765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification (2017, methodology): “…2007).5 [3] While we may attribute our use of the term ‘engagement’ to Landaburu’s work on Andoke, we also note that it has been used by others to discuss overlapping phenomena in discourse studies (e.g., Hyland, 2005) and in French linguistics, notably Desclés (2009) and Guentchéva (2011).”
‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing (2015, background): “The more frequent use of the noun complement structure in the soft fields is therefore not surprising, as authors in the humanities and social sciences are more likely to take a stance towards what they discuss and evaluate both their own and others’ work (Charles, 2007; Hyland, 2005).”
Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest (2008, background): “Ken Hyland, another well-respected name in ESP, uses corpus linguistics to discover textual evidence for interactions between writers and readers in studies of metadiscourse (Hyland 1999), hedging (Hyland 1998), and author stance and engagement (Hyland 2005).”
As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation (2008, background): “These labels refer to writerand reader-focused features of the discourse respectively, representing key aspects of interaction in texts (Hyland, 2005).”