THE ACQUISITION OF THE IP SYSTEM IN CHILD L2 ENGLISH

By B. Haznedar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2001

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children (2011, background): “In this account, the various domains of language need not develop simultaneously, but differential performance is allowed both across and within domains, e.g. between third person –s and past tense (Haznedar, 2001).”
Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular –s in child L2 English (2012, unknown): “More recent research that brought English L2 children’s difficulties with 3SG – s to the focus of attention are Haznedar (2001), Ionin and Wexler (2002), and Paradis, Rice, Crago, and Marquis (2008).”
Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology (2003, background): “Haznedar and Schwartz (1997) and Haznedar (2001) report dissociations between verbal inflection and various syntactic phenomena in production data from a Turkishspeaking child, named Erdem.”
Second Language Acquisition in Childhood (2008, background): “However, in the L2 acquisition of English, null subjects are infrequent or nonexistent, even when the children’s L1 permits null subjects (Haznedar, 2001; Ionin & Wexler, 2002; Lakshmanan, 1994).”