ABSORPTION-LINE PROBES OF THE PREVALENCE AND PROPERTIES OF OUTFLOWS IN PRESENT-DAY STAR-FORMING GALAXIES

By Yan-Mei Chen, Christy A. Tremonti, T. Heckman, G. Kauffmann, B. Weiner, J. Brinchmann, Jing Wang. 2010

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We analyze star-forming galaxies drawn from SDSS DR7 to show how the interstellar medium (ISM) Na i λλ5890, 5896 (Na D) absorption lines depend on galaxy physical properties, and to look for evidence of galactic winds. We combine the spectra of galaxies with similar geometry/physical parameters to create composite spectra with signal-to-noise ∼300. The stellar continuum is modeled using stellar population synthesis models, and the continuum-normalized spectrum is fit with two Na i absorption components. We find that (1) ISM Na D absorption lines with equivalent widths EW > 0.8 Å are only prevalent in disk galaxies with specific properties—large extinction (AV), high star formation rates (SFR), high SFR per unit area (ΣSFR), or high stellar mass (M*); (2) the ISM Na D absorption lines can be separated into two components: a quiescent disk-like component at the galaxy systemic velocity and an outflow component; (3) the disk-like component is much stronger in the edge-on systems, and the outflow component covers a wide angle but is stronger within 60° of the disk rotation axis; (4) the EW and covering factor of the disk component correlate strongly with dust attenuation, highlighting the importance that dust shielding may play in the survival of Na i; (5) the EW of the outflow component depends primarily on ΣSFR and secondarily on AV; and (6) the outflow velocity varies from ∼120 to 160 km s−1 but shows little hint of a correlation with galaxy physical properties over the modest dynamic range that our sample probes (1.2 dex in log ΣSFR and 1 dex in log M*).

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f96d66ab9dc35271c79793a0badc8a53db53e19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. T. Naab
  6. E. Quataert
  7. C. Faucher-Giguére
  8. R. Somerville

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. E. Quataert
  7. R. Somerville
  8. T. Naab

Citations in the corpus