Metallicity gradients in local field star-forming galaxies: insights on inflows, outflows, and the coevolution of gas, stars and metals

By I. Ho, R. Kudritzki, Lisa J. Kewley, H. Zahid, M. Dopita, F. Bresolin, D. Rupke. 2015

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present metallicity gradients in 49 local field star-form ing galaxies. We derive gas- phase oxygen abundances using two widely adopted metallicity calibrations based on the (O III)/H�, (N II)/Hand (N II)/(O II) line ratios. The two derived metallicity gradients are usually in good agreement within ±0.14 dex R −1 25 (R25 is the B-band iso-photoal radius), but the metallicity gradients can differ significantly when the ionisation parameters change systematically with radius. We investigate the metallicit y gradients as a function of stellar mass (8 MB > −22). When the metallicity gradients are expressed in dex kpc −1 , we show that galaxies with lower mass and luminosity, on average, have steeper metallicity gradients. When the metallicity gradients are expressed in dex R −1 25 , we find no correlation between the metallicity gradients, and stellar mass and luminosity. We provide a local benchmark metallicity gradient of field star-forming galaxies useful for comparison with studies at high redshifts. We investigate the origin of the local benchmark gradient using simple chemical evolution models and observed gas and stellar surface density profiles in nearby field spira l galaxies. Our models suggest that the local benchmark gradient is a direct result of the co evolution of gas and stellar disk under virtually closed-box chemical evolution when the stellar-to-gas mass ratio becomes high (≫ 0.3). These models imply low current mass accretion rates (. 0.3 × SFR), and low mass outflow rates ( . 3 × SFR) in local field star-forming galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e5e4f1f69ec789334a963bb7a068c31580c5a7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. Keres̆
  4. C. Faucher-Giguére
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Andrew Wetzel
  7. K. Bundy
  8. Thomas J. Cox

Citations in the corpus