THE SYSTEMATIC PROPERTIES OF THE WARM PHASE OF STARBURST-DRIVEN GALACTIC WINDS

By T. Heckman, R. Alexandroff, S. Borthakur, R. Overzier, C. Leitherer. 2015

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using ultraviolet absorption lines, we analyze the systematic properties of the warm ionized phase of starburst-driven winds in a sample of 39 low-redshift objects that spans broad ranges in starburst and galaxy properties. Total column densities for the outflows are ∼1021 cm−2. The outflow velocity (vout) correlates only weakly with the galaxy stellar mass ( M * ?> ), or circular velocity (vcir), but strongly with both SFR and SFR/area. The normalized outflow velocity ( v out / v cir ?> ) correlates well with both SFR/area and SFR/ M * ?> . The estimated outflow rates of warm ionized gas ( M ˙ ?> ) are ∼1–4 times the SFR, and the ratio M ˙ / SFR ?> does not correlate with vout. We show that a model of a population of clouds accelerated by the combined forces of gravity and the momentum flux from the starburst matches the data. We find a threshold value for the ratio of the momentum flux supplied by the starburst to the critical momentum flux needed for the wind to overcome gravity acting on the clouds (Rcrit). For R crit > ?> 10 (strong-outflows) the outflow’s momentum flux is similar to the total momentum flux from the starburst and the outflow velocity exceeds the galaxy escape velocity. Neither of these is the case for the weak outflows ( R crit < ?> 10). For the weak-outflows, the data severely disagree with many prescriptions in numerical simulations or semi-analytic models of galaxy evolution. The agreement is better for the strong outflows, and we advocate the use of Rcrit to guide future prescriptions.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bff473e117145e36d904f5580d920737297c0bc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. C. Faucher-Giguére
  3. E. Quataert
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. D. Keres̆
  6. C. Hayward
  7. N. Murray
  8. R. Dav'e

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. R. Maiolino
  3. C. Hayward
  4. C. Faucher-Giguére
  5. E. Quataert
  6. D. Keres̆
  7. D. Kerevs
  8. Daniel Anglés-Alcázar

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Faucher-Giguére
  4. E. Quataert
  5. D. Keres̆
  6. C. Hayward
  7. Thomas J. Cox
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus