Triple-testing the quality of multinationality–performance research: An internalization theory perspective

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Global, Local, or Regional? The Locus of MNE Strategies (2016, unknown): “Overviews of the methodological soundness of this empirical work paint a rather dim picture of the state-of-the-art (Verbeke and Brugman, 2009; Verbeke and Forootan, 2012).”
A theoretical assessment of the empirical literature on the impact of multinationality on performance (2011, background): “’ What accounts for these disappointing results and where do we go from here? This article adds to the small but growing number of contributions (Hennart, 2007; Verbeke and Brugman, 2009; Verbeke, Li, and Goerzen, 2009) which argue that we should not continue the present trend of ever more sophistic”
A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective on how Collaboration Intensity, Trust, and International Market Knowledge affect Family Firms' Multinationality (2016, background): “…active, a multidimensional view implies that: multinational enterprises’ actions across each of these dimensions are not independent from each other (Verbeke & Brugman, 2009); an enterprise can both export and own or control producing facilities in more than one country simultaneously (Dunning,…”
Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research (2010, result): “The problem is somewhat similar to the one found in the largely misconceived empirical literature assessing the link between multinationality and performance (Hennart, 2007; Verbeke & Brugman, 2009; Verbeke, Li, and Goerzen, 2009).”