Innovation in Education Markets: Theory and Evidence on the Impact of Competition and Choice in Charter Schools

By C. Lubienski. 2003

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e1fd1ca8c2e9f541bb2ef6a19210364f4a779b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. S. Lubienski
2. Huriya Jabbar
3. Antoni Verger
4. Kathleen Lynch
5. C. Lubienski
6. Marie Moran
7. Ellen B. Goldring
8. M. Berends

In Information Systems and Management

1. Antoni Verger
2. Huriya Jabbar
3. S. Lubienski
4. Kathleen Lynch
5. Marie Moran
6. Ellen B. Goldring
7. M. Berends

In Public Administration

1. S. Lubienski
2. Huriya Jabbar
3. Antoni Verger
4. Kathleen Lynch
5. Marie Moran
6. M. Berends
7. Ellen B. Goldring

Citations in the corpus

• “Every Kid Is Money” (2015, background): “Schools scanned the environment and mimicked each other (Lubienski, 2003; Woods et al., 1998), in the case of marketing, whereas others differentiated themselves and sought a niche (e.g., White, 1981).”
• School Markets: The Impact of Information Approximating Schools' Effectiveness. NBER Working Paper No. 13676. (2007, neutral): “See for instance Armour and Peiser (1998), Ascher et al. (1996), Elacqua and Fabrega (2004), Henig (1994), Kleitz et al. (2000), and Lubienski (2003).”
• School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools (2012, background): “As Lubienski (2003) states, “Choice, competition, and innovation are cast as the necessary vehicles for advancing academic outcomes” (p.”
• Framing and selling global education policy: the promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts (2012, background): “…negative effects they can have, above all in terms of education inequalities, such as Braun, Jenkins, and Grigg (2006), Easterly (2001), Gibbons, Machin, and Silva (2008), Levin (1999), Lubienski (2003), Whitty and Power (2000), etc.16 On occasion, critical authors are quoted in the ePPP documents.”
• Markets, schools and the convertibility of economic capital: the complex dynamics of class choice (2006, background): “There is an extensive literature deconstructing the ideology of ‘choice’ within an educational context, especially in the United Kingdom (Whitty et al , 1998 ; Ball, 2003 ; Lubienski, 2003 ; Reay & Lucey, 2003 ).”
• Charter, Private, Public Schools and Academic Achievement: New Evidence from NAEP Mathematics Data (2006, background): “…and had obvious implications for the allocation of government resources — that is, if the private sector can educate children more effectively (and for less money), then it is difficult to justify the exclusive hold that public schools have on public funding for education (Lubienski, 2001, 2003c).”