Response to Intervention: Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice. Practical Intervention in the Schools Series. Second Edition.

By Rachel Brown-Chidsey, M. Steege. 2005

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Proactive, Early Screening to Detect Behaviorally At-Risk Students: Issues, Approaches, Emerging Innovations, and Professional Practices. (2007, background): “…in which the intensity of delivered services is increased only after the child's skills or target behaviors have not shown an adequate response to intervention (Brown-Chidsey & Steege, 2005; National Association of State Directors of Special Education, 2005; Tilly, Reschly, & Grimes, 1999).”
A Positive Youth Development Model for Students Considered At-Risk (2007, methodology): “The ecological approach supports early intervention models [such as response-to-intervention (RTI); see Brown-Chidsey and Steege (2005) for a thorough review of RTI] because it offers comprehensive and universal primary prevention.”
Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus (2010, background): “…the utility of increasing intervention intensity in an RTI model as is suggested by some RTI proponents (Ardoin et al., 2005; Barnett et al., 2004; Brown-Chidsey & Steege, 2005; Deno, 2002; Daly III et al., 2007; Fletcher, Denton, & Francis, 2005; Fletcher & Vaughn, 2007; Gresham, 2004; Jimerson…”