Consumer Demand For And Attitudes Toward Alternative Beef Labeling Strategies In France, Germany, And The Uk

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, background): “Several studies have investigated what consumers are willing to pay to avoid or obtain various food attributes (McCluskey et al., 2003; Grannis and Thilmany, 2002; Roosen, Lusk, and Fox, 2003; Burton et al., 2001; Lusk, Roosen, and Fox, 2003; Roosen, 2003; Alfnes, 2004; Tonsor et al., 2005).”
Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects (2012, background): “Because the label is issued by official third parties and backed by governments, it should be a well-trusted cue (Roosen et al. 2003).”
Varieties of Environmental Labelling, Market Structures, and Sustainable Consumption Across Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational and Market Supply Determinants of Environmental-Labelled Goods (2011, background): “There is some empirical support that state involvement promotes consumer confidence in environmental labels (Roosen et al. 2003; Sønderskov and Daugbjerg 2010; Zanoli 2004).”
European food scares and their impact on EU food policy (2007, background): “Consequently, this process creates a short-term negative impact upon consumer consumption/purchase behaviour as well as negatively impact upon the producer, manufacturer or retailer ( Roosen et al. , 2003”