College Students’ Responses to Antismoking Messages: Denial, Defiance, and Other Boomerang Effects
By J. Wolburg. 2006
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/366ab64f2a2e3d003a0f5bbd80d0821610c1ce60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Literature and Literary Theory
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate Change: The Role of Prior Views and Political Identification (2018, background): “Similarly, research has shown that anti-littering (Rains & Turner, 2007), anti-smoking (Shoham, Trost, & Rohrbaugh, 2004; Wolburg, 2006) and safe-driving (Moyer-Gusé et al.”
- Alcohol's Getting a Bit More Social: When Alcohol Marketing Messages on Facebook Increase Young Adults’ Intentions to Imbibe (2015, background): “This is echoed in findings related to the boomerang effects of anti-alcohol, anti-smoking, and anti-drug messages that end up increasing consumption likelihood upon exposure to messages denouncing such behaviors (Hornik, 2006; Ringold, 2002; Wolburg, 2006; Yzer, Capella, Fishbein, Hornik, & Ahern, 2”
- Boomerang Effects in Science Communication (2012, background): “For example, antismoking messages can increase predispositions to smoke (Wolburg, 2006), antilitter messages can increase predispositions to litter (Reich & Robertson, 1979), and appeals for donations to impoverished children can lower donation rates (Small, Loewenstein, & Slovic, 2007).”
- The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework (2009, background): “Messages that intend to lower smoking behavior can actually increase smoking rates (Wolburg, 2006).”