Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate Change: The Role of Prior Views and Political Identification
By Yanni Ma, Graham N. Dixon, Jay D. Hmielowski. Environmental Communication, 2018
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
ABSTRACT Scholars continue to search for solutions to shift climate change skeptics’ views on climate science and policy. However, research has shown that certain audiences are resistant to change regarding environmental issues. To explore this issue further, we examine the presence of reactance among different audiences in response to simple, yet prominently used, climate change messages. Our results show that emphasizing the scientific consensus of climate change produces reactance, but only among people who question the existence of climate change. Moreover, adding political identification to the model as an additional moderating variable shows the increases in reactance occur among Republicans who question the existence of climate change. Finally, our results show that reactance to climate change messaging may lead to backfiring effects on important outcomes tied to climate change such as risk perceptions, climate change beliefs, and support for mitigation policies.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ea67fee25192033b667d33c1b26d413a676047d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Influencing Climate Change Attitudes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020, background): “…effectiveness of consensus messaging – especially when looking at attitudes such as belief and support for policy – is debated (Dixon, Hmielowski, & Ma, 2019, 2017; Kahan, 2017; Kerr & Wilson, 2018; Ma, Dixon, & Hmielowski, 2019; van der Linden, Leiserowitz, & Maibach, 2018, 2017; van der…”