Beyond Student Evaluation of Teaching: Identifying and addressing academic staff development needs
By R. Ballantyne, Jill Borthwick, Jan Packer. 2000
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35949767470794e40e0614109dbfff4ee262a7c9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Keisha Valdez Noel
- Erik Blair
- John T. E. Richardson
- Calvin D. Smith
- D. Mortelmans
- Abdelhamid M. Ahmed
- P. Spooren
- Adela García-Aracil
Citations in the corpus
- Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert‐scales (2007, background): “Therefore, Ballantyne et al. (2000) state that when student evaluations are used to improve teaching quality, much attention must be given to personal follow-up and correct information on the use, procedure and results of these evaluations.”
- Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education (2008, methodology): “The summative uses of these data to demonstrate satisfactory teaching for promotion or tenure purposes seems better established than their formative use for improving teaching (Ballantyne et al. 2000; Neumann 2001).”
- Students’ Problems with Cohesion and Coherence in EFL Essay Writing in Egypt: Different Perspectives (2010, result): “This issue has also been noted in other international research studies and led to a call for greater accountability and improvement in the quality of teaching in higher education [8].”
- Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? (2014, background): “Judicious use of such feedback can lead to improvements in practice (Ballantyne, Borthwick, and Packer 2000; Yao and Grady 2005; Zhao and Gallant 2012) only when it is accompanied by institutional and individual ambition (Kember, Leung, and Kwan 2002; Marsh 2007).”
- Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature (2005, background): “However, the development needs that students ascribe to their teachers may be driven by a didactic model of teaching and may differ from the teachers’ own perceived needs (Ballantyne et al., 2000).”