Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis

By Paul Ingram, Masahiko Aoki. 2002

1,672 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3563115c364166bb16d9cad2da2b530fc4f8f358

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey (2012, positive): “Such a definition can be applied to institutions as well (see, for example, Amable, 2000 – for a general discussion on the relation between complementarities among institutional arrangements and national systems of innovation – and Aoki, 2001).”
Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business (2008, background): “and network forms of organization, such as in Silicon Valley (Aoki, 2001).”
The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan (2008, background): “Aoki (2001) points out that venture capitalists in Silicon Valley are functioning as financial intermediaries, who can assess how tacit knowledge may influence the successful commercialization of innovation by entrepreneurial start-up firms.”
How and why capitalisms differ (2005, background): “It is within this framework that the concept of institutional complementarity shows its true power (Amable 1999 ; Aoki 2001 ).”
Institutions and Individuals: Interaction and Evolution (2007, neutral): “The proposition that explanations cannot be reduced to individuals alone has now taken hold in the new institutional economics, notably in the work of Masahiko Aoki (2001).”
Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “Building on Aoki’s pioneering work on how the various features of the Japanese firm are systematically interrelated (Aoki, 1988, 1994), a number of scholars suggest that different corporate governance models can be explained by strategic complementarities (Aoki, 2001; Milgrom & Roberts, 1994, 1995).”
Institutions, rules, and equilibria: a unified theory* (2014, methodology): “In the first part of this paper we have merged the rule-based and the equilibrium-based approaches, along the lines of Aoki (2001, 2007, 2011) and Grief and Kingston (2011), into a unitary framework that we have called the ‘rules-in-equilibrium’ account.”
Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture (2014, background): “wealthier provinces had more patents: B(26) = 2.”
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems (2010, positive): “Scholars have carefully documented effective farmer designed and operated systems in many countries including Japan (Masahiko Aoki 2001), India (Ruth Meinzen-Dick 2007; Pranab K. Bardhan 2000), and Sri Lanka (Norman T. Uphoff 1991).”
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics as the New Mainstream? (2007, background): “Even more clearly, Masahiko Aoki (2001) identifies the problem of infinite explanatory regress in much of the former literature and develops a novel approach. He takes as given not only individuals, but also a historically bestowed set of institutions. With these materials, he explores the evolution”
Social Capital, Human Capital and the Community Mechanism: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Economists (2009, background): “First of all, the sum of informal and formal rules to constrain human behaviours amounts to a well-established concept called ‘institutions’, for which remarkable advances in economic analysis have been recorded in recent years (North, 1981, 1990; Williamson, 1985; Aoki, 2001; Greif, 2006).”