Mobility Styles and Travel Behavior: Application of a Lifestyle Approach to Leisure Travel
By M. Lanzendorf. 2002
154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34ebef1f863fa63e26656d2f9fb8c72d1a07a436
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Transportation
- Frank Witlox
- Veronique Van Acker
- Bert van Wee
- Joachim Scheiner
- Christian Holz-Rau
- J. De Vos
- Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson
- Sungyop Kim
Citations in the corpus
- Key research themes on travel behavior, lifestyle, and sustainable urban mobility (2016, methodology): “Applying factor and cluster analysis to leisure and mobility data from four neighborhoods in Cologne, Germany, Lanzendorf (2002) identified seven lifestyles (although referred to them as “mobility styles”).”
- Travel Mode Choice of the Elderly: Effects of Personal, Household, Neighborhood, and Trip Characteristics (2004, background): “Lanzendorf (9) studied leisure travel time and mode choice, and Polzin et al.”
- Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice (2014, background): “Several studies that have examined individual mode choice have acknowledged the need to incorporate the influence of values explicitly (Bamberg 1996; Lanzendorf 2002; Choo and Mokhtarian 2004; Zhao 2009).”
- Identifying target groups for environmentally sustainable transport: assessment of different segmentation approaches (2013, unknown): “Mobility styles [12,25] Sensitive for new forms of behaviour; high relevance for destination choice and travelled distances; also relevant for mode choice and environmental impact Entire spectrum of soft-policy measures; Symbolic-affective design and communication of products and services Measuremen”
- Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants? (2007, background): “In doing so, a differentiated understanding of travel demand is created in a subject oriented approach (Lanzendorf 2002).”
- When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour (2010, background): “…cannot be taken into account (e.g. Borgers et al., 1997; Golledge and Stimson, 1997; Gärling et al., 1998), whereas other researchers state the opposite (e.g. Camstra, 1996; Kitamura et al., 1997; Bagley and Mokhtarian, 2002; Lanzendorf, 2002; Parkany et al., 2004; Collantes and Mokhtarian, 2007).”
- Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles (2010, unknown): “Lanzendorf (2002) studies four neighbourhoods in Cologne.”