Stability of Continuous Measures of Sociometric Status: A Meta-Analysis.

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Participation of Students with Special Needs in Regular Primary Education in the Netherlands (2010, unknown): “A three-point or five-point scale is generally used (Hymel, Vaillancourt, McDougal, & Renshaw, 2002; Jiang & Cillessen, 2005).”
Inclusive Teachers' Attitudinal Ratings of Their Students With Disabilities (2007, background): “For example, in a metaanalysis of the reliability of sociometric measures, Jian and Cillessen (2005) reported that the mean test–retest correlation for acceptance ratings was .”
Predicting Academic Achievement and Attainment: The Contribution of Early Academic Skills, Attention Difficulties, and Social Competence (2016, background): “…stability of social preference within a 3-month interval exceeds 0.80 and has been reported to range from 0.32 to 0.77 for 3- to 18-month intervals (Jiang & Cillessen, 2005); the reliability and validity of social-preference scores for children of similar age to those in our sample have also been…”
Peer relationships in adolescence. (2009, background): “Studies suggest that sociometric status (being popular, accepted, neglected, or rejected) is not very stable, although more so for the rejected category than others (Jiang & Cillessen, 2005 ).”