Factor Structure of the Self-Construal Scale Revisited

By E. Hardin, Frederick T. L. Leong, Aditya A. Bhagwat. 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32d8f00fce24b4dff63f0c3dd7a8ea0f2c5d9313

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Berna Gerçek-Swing
2. Susan E. Cross
3. E. Hardin
4. Linda G. Castillo
5. Peter B. Smith
6. R. Cheng
7. Shui‐fong Lam
8. Ronald Fischer

In Social Psychology

1. E. Hardin
2. Berna Gerçek-Swing
3. Susan E. Cross
4. Linda G. Castillo
5. Peter B. Smith
6. Charles Harb
7. Ronald Fischer
8. A. Church

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Hardin
2. Berna Gerçek-Swing
3. Susan E. Cross
4. Linda G. Castillo
5. Peter B. Smith
6. Charles Harb
7. Ronald Fischer
8. A. Church

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Construals Across Cultures (2008, background): “Indeed, Hardin, Leong, and Bhagwat (2004) were able to identify an assertiveness factor distinct from other aspects of independence within the solution that they obtained among U.S. responses to the Singelis (1994) Self-Construal Scale.”
• Construction and initial validation of the Marianismo Beliefs Scale (2010, background): “Researchers have reported evidence of reliability and construct validity for the SCS subscales (Singelis et al., 1995; Hardin et al., 2004).”
• The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal (2011, background): “Heine et al. (2002) argued that because measures of selfconstrual do not specify a reference group, participants are likely to use their own cultural group as their referent. Indeed, across two studies with bicultural Canadian and Japanese participants, such reference group effects were found in sco”