Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Aspects of working memory in L2 learning (2011, methodology): “…Waters & Caplan (1996b) in English − has been the most successful in explaining some variation in studies published so far (e.g. Sunderman & Kroll 2009; Dussias & Piñar 2010; Sagarra & Herschensohn 2010), but it is unclear why at this point this particular test correlates with such a variety of…”
TIMED AND UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS MEASURE DISTINCT TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE (2015, unknown): “In analyzing correct responses only, we followed the convention of reading time analyses in previous processing studies (e.g., L1: Garnsey, Pearlmutter, Myers, & Lotocky, 1997 ; Phillips, 2006 ; L2: Dussias & Piñar, 2010 ; Juffs, 2005 ; Omaki & Schulz, 2011 ; White & Juffs, 1998 ).”
Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap* (2012, background): “…L2 syntactic processing (Frenck-Mestre, 2002; Hahne, 2001; Hopp, 2006; Jackson, 2008) and there is also some evidence that L2 learners’ WM capacity can influence their realtime L2 syntactic processing (Dussias & Piñar, 2010; Havik, Roberts, van Hout, Schreuder & Haverkort, 2009; Williams, 2006).”