A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory

By Yu Dan, H. Chieh. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 2008

570 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3246a1169e8ea4537ec72961038bba2deeea2bee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Aiqi Wu
2. Alan L. Porter
3. Steven Si
4. Xue Yu
5. Song Chen
6. Shouming Chen
7. Arho Suominen
8. Peter Serdyukov

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Alan L. Porter
2. Arho Suominen
3. Peter Serdyukov
4. Munan Li

In Strategy and Management

1. Aiqi Wu
2. Alan L. Porter
3. Steven Si
4. Arho Suominen
5. Peter Serdyukov
6. Munan Li
7. Marcello M. Mariani
8. Matteo Borghi

Citations in the corpus

• A model for understanding the orders of magnitude of disruptive technologies (2017, unknown): “Yu and Hang (2010) distinguish between disruptive innovation and destructive innovation.”
• Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? (2017, background): “Innovations can be categorized as evolutionary or revolutionary (Osolind, 2012), sustaining or disruptive (Christensen and Overdorf, 2000; Yu and Hang, 2010).”
• Incumbent Performance in the Face of a Radical Innovation: Towards a Framework for Incumbent Challenger Dynamics (2012, unknown): “ectural classification (Henderson and Clark, 1990) explains why ncumbents whose organizational structures are optimized for a iven architecture of products, suffer in the face of architectural hanges in products or services (Yu and Hang, 2009).”
• Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: A bibliometric perspective (2017, methodology): “Yu and Hang (2010) review the concepts of DT tracing the origins of this mainstream theory from Schumpeter (1942), McKinsey & Foster (1986), and Henderson and Clark (1990) to the seminal work of Christensen (Bower & Christensen, 1995; Christensen, 1997; Christensen & Overdorf, 2000).”
• Entrepreneurship and poverty reduction: A case study of Yiwu, China (2014, background): “Prior studies of disruptive innovation identified a number of underlying mechanisms (incentive systems, capabilities, cognition and cost structures) of disruptive innovation, which helped us understand the role of peasant entrepreneurs as disrupters (e.g., Yu & Hang, 2010).”