Alan L. Porter

Strategy and Management · 2004–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Strategy and Management — 21 citations into it; #8,384 of 10,874 by trust here, #9,798 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 17 citations into it; #4,730 of 12,932 by trust here, #4,809 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 15 citations into it
• Management of Technology and Innovation — 14 citations into it; #2,666 of 3,602 by trust here, #3,192 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 11 citations into it
• Information Systems — 10 citations into it; #3,186 of 8,771 by trust here, #4,885 by citations
• Statistical and Nonlinear Physics — 6 citations into it
• Molecular Biology — 5 citations into it; #5,751 of 17,773 by trust here, #13,009 by citations

Whom Alan L. Porter trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Kevin W. Boyack
2. Richard Klavans
3. Chaomei Chen
4. Constantinos Markides
5. Yu Dan
6. Robert J. Lempert
7. Matthew E. Falagas
8. Zan Huang
9. Ronald N. Kostoff
10. Katy Börner

Who trusts Alan L. Porter overall

1. Erin Leahey
2. E. Schoolman
3. Catherine Beaudry
4. Chaomei Chen
5. Shirley S. Ho
6. An Zeng
7. Loet Leydesdorff
8. Christine M. Beckman
9. Ismael Rafols
10. Marcello M. Mariani

Papers from Alan L. Porter's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Alan L. Porter trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Web site design with the patron in mind: A step-by-step guide for libraries
2. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
3. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology
4. When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition
5. Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory*
6. Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda
7. International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database
8. Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field
9. Mapping the backbone of science (Scientometrics)
10. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (The FASEB Journal)

Their papers

• Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009) — 813 citations
• Refining search terms for nanotechnology (2008) — 381 citations
• Big Macs and Eigenfactor scores: Don't let correlation coefficients fool you (2009) — 366 citations
• Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods (2004) — 407 citations
• Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and leading authors, institutions and countries in the 50 years of Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2021) — 124 citations
• Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: A bibliometric perspective (2017) — 127 citations
• Four dimensional Science and Technology planning: A new approach based on bibliometrics and technology roadmapping (2014) — 123 citations