Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: A bibliometric perspective
By Munan Li, Alan L. Porter, Arho Suominen. 2017
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0410fbbd2bb4bf62dd5ec0e9118350e47c67764d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Review of Its Managerial Intellectual Structure and Potential Evolution in the Service Industries (2019, methodology): “To this end, we processed the similarity matrix through network analysis; it is considered a fresh, effective, and accurate approach toward finding subgroups in bibliometric studies (Zupic and Čarter, 2015), and it has been increasingly adopted in the latest bibliometric studies (Ma et al., 2012; Vo”
- Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews (2019, background): “For example, systematic reviews facilitated by using CiteSpace include a diverse range of research areas such as regenerative medicine [12], natural disaster research [13], greenhouse gas emission [14], and identifying disruptive innovation and emerging technology [15].”