How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups?
By Richard A. Wolfe, Daniel S. Putler. Organ. Sci., 2002
419 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/324411b788c8212408e9e34973c9dbb27e94060b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Colin Eden
- Fran Ackermann
- George B. Cunningham
- André O. Laplume
- Karan Sonpar
- Reginald A. Litz
- P. Neves
- Stephen J. Jaros
Citations in the corpus
- The relationships among commitment to change,coping with change, and turnover intentions (2006, result): “However, it should be noted that there is little research to show that such employees react differently to change than do employees in other settings, and other authors have used similar samples to examine organizational behaviour-related research questions (eg, Cunningham & Rivera, 2001 ; Wolfe & ”
- Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us (2008, background): “To be thorough, we also cross-referenced our sample with two previous review efforts (Wolfe & Putler, 2002; Wood, 1991b), resulting in 10 additional articles that met our criteria.”
- Strategic management of stakeholders : theory and practice (2011, background): “One of the difficulties that emerged e for both participants and facilitators e was getting a sensible balance between recognising the uniqueness of each organization’s stakeholders and being faced with ‘an unhelpfully long list’ (Wolfe and Putler, 2002, p. 65).”