The Rationalizing Effects of Cognitive Load on Emotion-Based Trade-off Avoidance
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31b3d067d8ff4435fca7b7c44deb554a411ed5dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Michel Tuan Pham
- Joel B. Cohen
- Eduardo B. Andrade
- Alokparna (Sonia) Basu Monga
- Deborah Roedder John
- Elke U. Weber
- George Loewenstein
- Patti Y. Williams
In General Decision Sciences
- Paul Slovic
- Michel Tuan Pham
- George Loewenstein
- Elke U. Weber
- Eduardo B. Andrade
- Deborah A. Small
- Joel B. Cohen
- Deborah Roedder John
In Marketing
- Deborah Roedder John
- Alokparna (Sonia) Basu Monga
- Loraine Lau-Gesk
- Michel Tuan Pham
- Patti Y. Williams
- A. Drolet
- Joel B. Cohen
- Paul Slovic
Citations in the corpus
- The Nature and Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior (2008, background): “Th is avoidant behavior is attenuated under situations of cognitive load, which reduces the aversiveness of the trade-off s by making them less apparent (Drolet & Luce, 2004).”
- Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. (2007, background): “Other evidence that deliberation can generate affect comes from Drolet and Luce (2004). They find that cognitive load mitigates the affective turmoil of emotionladen trade-off decisions.”
- Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products (2007, background): “Future research might investigate other moderators, such as experience or cognitive load-variables which, like age, have qualitative effects on decision making (Drolet and Luce 2004).”
- When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking (2008, methodology): “Cognitive load was manipulated by asking participants in the low (vs. high) load condition to memorize a list of 1 (vs. 10) word(s) to be recalled at the end of the study (Drolet & Luce, 2004).”
- The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research (2011, background): “…has emerged regarding the effects of many situational factors—characteristics of the situation in which the decision is faced—including time pressure (e.g., Dror et al., 1999; Verplanken, 1993), cognitive load (e.g., Drolet & Luce, 2004; Ebert, 2001), and social context (e.g., Nadler et al., 2001).”
- Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity (2017, unknown): “…Sood, and Brenner 2007), amplify the preference for simple (and possibly inferior) solutions (Drolet, Luce, and Simonson 2009), increase consumers ’ willingness to make attribute trade-offs (Drolet and Luce 2004), and heighten susceptibility to anchoring effects (Deck and Jahedi 2015).”