From Personality and Assessment (1968) to Personality Science, 2009

By Walter Mischel. 2009

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31993bc84835c0ce033b3fa5cd231c204697f85b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Systematic Review of the Career Adaptability Literature and Future Outlook (2018, background): “Thus, the meaning attached to situations is important for how individuals adapt and regulate in response to situations (Mischel, 2009; Shoda, LeeTiernan, & Mischel, 2002).”
Resisting Everything except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain–specific Impulsivity (2012, background): “…examining patterns of behaviour that are consistent across certain types of situations—we might ‘reconcile the variability of the individual’s behavior across situations with our intuitive conviction that each individual is characterized by stable and distinctive qualities’ (Mischel, 2009, p. 284).”
Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Factors (2010, background): “Nunes et al. (2007) found that denial was only related to recidivism for offenders who scored low on the RRASOR (Hanson, 1997), a four-item actuarial risk assessment instrument for sexual offenders.”
The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates (2016, background): “A person’s behavior is an expression of that individual’s personality in a given social context (Mischel, 2009).”
The Person–Situation Debate Revisited: Effect of Situation Strength and Trait Activation on the Validity of the Big Five Personality Traits in Predicting Job Performance (2014, background): “Specifically, by relying on “unconditional and uncontextualized” (Mischel, 2009: 287) conceptualizations of traits, we do not consider the kind of “behavioral signatures” advocated by Mischel (see Mischel & Shoda, 1995), or the conditional measures similarly advanced by Bandura (1999).”