Simulation, Scenarios, and Emotional Appraisal: Testing the Convergence of Real and Imagined Reactions to Emotional Stimuli
By Michael D. Robinson, Gerald L. Clore. 2001
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31950ad43601fbca5f7b66e65664c8b876ecc6ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Peter Kuppens
- C. Carver
- Jessica L. Tracy
- Richard W. Robins
- Eddie Harmon-Jones
- Sameer Hosany
- I. Van Mechelen
- Agnes Moors
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jessica L. Tracy
- C. Carver
- Sameer Hosany
- Richard W. Robins
- Michael Wenzel
- T. Okimoto
- Peter Kuppens
- I. Van Mechelen
Citations in the corpus
- "HOW HAPPY WAS I, ANYWAY?" A RETROSPECTIVE IMPACT BIAS (2003, background): “Robinson and Clore (2002) argued that emotional experiences are never stored in memory in a form that can be retrieved directly later.”
- Beyond Retribution: Conceptualizing Restorative Justice and Exploring its Determinants (2009, result): “Notably, however, there is some evidence that appraisals of imagined situations are similar to those observed in real situations (see Robinson & Clore, 2001 ), suggesting that vignette techniques are particularly useful for theory development and in contexts in which experimental manipulations are ”
- Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? (2010, methodology): “Prior research testing the convergence of reactions to real situations versus scenarios has shown that persons react almost identically to scenarios as they do to real situations (Robinson & Clore, 2001).”
- Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened self-esteem, other-blame, and frustration (2007, methodology): “Also, in general, this methodology has proven to produce valid information regarding appraisal and emotion, and to be useful in theory construction in these domains of research ( Robinson & Clore, 2001; Schorr, 2001).”
- Indulgence as Self Reward for Prior Shopping Restraint (2009, neutral): “Correspondingly, those products that were seen as more valuable in the shortthan in the long-term (average short- vs. long-term value within books Ms=3.71 vs. 2.99, F(1, 323)=28.29, pb .001; Ms = 3.67 vs. 2.88, F(1, 323) = 20.05, pb .001 within software)1 were selected as indulgent products.”
- An Identity Perspective on Ethical Leadership to Explain Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Interplay of Follower Moral Identity and Leader Group Prototypicality (2019, background): “Such vignettes have proved to be as effective as laboratory experiments at evoking responses (Robinson and Clore 2001).”
- Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice (2010, background): “Research by Robinson and Clore (2001) indicates that scenario-based methodologies actually show remarkably good validity in terms of participants’ appraisals and reported emotions as well as their interrelations.”
- Confronting Perpetrators of Prejudice: The Inhibitory Effects of Social Costs1 (2004, background): “Perhaps, for most phenomena we are correct (see Robinson & Clore, 2001).”
- On the Causal Role of Appraisal in Emotion (2013, background): “…can be manipulated (a) indirectly via the manipulation of real (Roseman & Evdokas, 2004) or representational stimuli (e.g., pictures, scenarios; Robinson & Clore, 2001; C. A. Smith & Lazarus, 1993) in the hope that participants will appraise them in a certain way, or (b) directly, with words…”
- Appraisal Determinants of Tourist Emotional Responses (2012, methodology): “Recallbased methods are arguably foundational to the majority of appraisal theories (Scherer 1988; Parkinson and Manstead 1992) and have shown to be valid in measuring appraisalemotion relations (Robinson and Clore 2001).”
- Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. (2004, methodology): “Because the situations were hypothetical, there might be concern that participants' responses were not veridical (despite such evidence as that of Robinson & Clore, 2001).”