Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened self-esteem, other-blame, and frustration
By Peter Kuppens, I. Van Mechelen. 2007
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37fbd4b52ebdc5ec9d19b507ceb86800d3182798
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Peter Kuppens
- Paul J Silvia
- E. M. Tong
- Klaus R. Scherer
- Leslie D. Kirby
- Craig A. Smith
- I. Van Mechelen
- Dirk Smits
In Social Psychology
- Paul J Silvia
- Peter Kuppens
- E. M. Tong
- Klaus R. Scherer
- Elizabeth M. Brown
- I. Van Mechelen
- Craig A. Smith
- Leslie D. Kirby
Citations in the corpus
- An appraisal account of individual differences in emotional experience (2010, background): “…Sydeman, Owen, & Marsch, 1999), is associated with the tendency to appraise events as more frustrating and unfair and others as more blameworthy (Kuppens & Van Mechelen, 2007; Kuppens et al., 2008), trait curiosity is associated with perceived ability to understand complex materials (Silvia,…”
- The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model (2009, background): “feeling lowly valued by others in non-evaluative situations; Kuppens & Van Mechelen, 2007 ).”
- Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. (2007, background): “Appraising an event as intentionally goal incongruent is the core of anger (Kuppens & Van Mechelen, 2007).”
- Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion (2009, background): “Although there have been some efforts in this direction (eg, Kuppens & Van Mechelen, 2007 ), relational models of appraisal have received much less theoretical and empirical attention than have the structural models.”
- Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience (2007, result): “As a consequence, this link has been argued to constitute the key to understanding individual differences in emotion; yet, research efforts that have directly examined this issue are far from abundant (eg, Smith & Pope, 1992 ; van Reekum & Scherer, 1997 ; for an exception, see Kuppens & Van Mechel”