Staging Exchange Partner Choices: When Do Status and Reputation Matter?
By Michael Jensen, A. Roy. 2008
306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30442864632d20d694417d51636f82db23826a7c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Timothy G. Pollock
- Gokhan Ertug
- David Gomulya
- Peggy M. Lee
- F. Castellucci
- Violina P. Rindova
- Warren Boeker
- D. Bergh
In Finance
- Timothy G. Pollock
- Gokhan Ertug
- F. Castellucci
- Violina P. Rindova
- Peggy M. Lee
- D. Bergh
- B. Boyd
- H. Milanov
Citations in the corpus
- Unraveling the mechanisms of reputation and alliance formation: : A study of venture capital syndication in China (2014, unknown): “A firm can have a reputation for high-quality products (Rhee and Haunschild, 2006), business integrity (Jensen and Roy, 2008), or being cooperative (Baum et al., 2000).”
- The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication (2010, background): “Although the two terms have been often used interchangeably, status and reputation are distinct facets of organizational standing and have different consequences for organizational behavior and performance (Podolny, 2005; Jensen and Roy, 2008).”
- New Frontiers of the Reputation—Performance Relationship: Insights From Multiple Theories (2010, background): “The integration of the status and reputation literatures raises some interesting questions for future research (cf. Jensen & Roy, 2008; Washington & Zajac, 2005).”
- Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma (2019, background): “Reputational evaluations are typically made relative to some particular referent group (Fombrun, 2012; Jensen & Roy, 2008) and can vary based on the role the firm is playing (Jensen,Kim,&Kim, 2012) and the evaluating audience (Ertug, Yogev, Lee, &Hedström, 2016; Jensen et al., 2012; Zavyalova,…”
- Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms (2009, background): “Mgmt. J., 30: 941–958 (2009) Published online EarlyView in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/smj.774 Received 2 August 2004; Final revision received 9 March 2009 STRUCTURAL HOMOPHILY OR SOCIAL ASYMMETRY?”
- Getting What You Need: How Reputation and Status Affect Team Performance, Hiring, and Salaries in the NBA (2013, background): “In this paper, we follow Jensen et al. (2012) and Jensen and Roy (2008), who argued that reputation should be defined as an attributespecific assessment, considering it an “expectation of future behavior that is directly based on past demonstrations of that behavior” (p.”
- Organizational Reputation: A Review (2011, background): “Other authors who emphasize a firm’s prior performance when describing organizational reputation include Jensen and Roy (2008) and Dimov, Shepherd, and Sutcliffe (2007: 486), who say that “reputation serves as a signal of future performance based on perceptions of past performance.””
- Perceptions of Employee Volunteering: Is It “Credited” or “Stigmatized” by Colleagues? (2016, background): “…our focus on volunteer reputation represents a pivot away from treating reputation as a global evaluation toward a more specific evaluation—that is, an attribute-specific evaluation based on prior behaviors by a specific audience (Jensen et al., 2012; Jensen & Roy, 2008; Lange et al., 2011).”
- How firms respond to financial restatement : CEO successors and external reactions (2014, background): “The status and prestige associated with prior education helps outside observers in assessing CEO successors, increasing the likelihood that restating firms will select successors with more prestigious educational backgrounds (Jensen & Roy, 2008; Jensen, Kim, & Kim, 2012).”
- Why 'Good' Firms Do Bad Things: The Effects of High Aspirations, High Expectations and Prominence on the Incidence of Corporate Illegality (2010, unknown): “Following Jensen and Roy (2008), we employed multiple imputation using the “ice” command in Stata 9.2 (Royston, 2005a, 2005b) to impute values for governance variables with missing values.”
- MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R (2011, background): “…(Smith et al. 2004a,b; Hille et al. 2005; Alati et al. 2006; O’Callaghan et al. 2006; Hille et al. 2007; Hartog et al. 2008), management sciences (Jensen and Roy 2008), occupational health (Heymans et al. 2007; Brunner et al. 2007; Chamberlain et al. 2008), politics (Tanasoiu and Colonescu…”
- Audience Heterogeneity and the Effectiveness of Market Signals: How to Overcome Liabilities of Foreignness in Film Exports? (2014, unknown): “In other words, we seek to understand not only when market signals are important, as has been the focus of other research (Jensen & Roy, 2008; Podolny, 1994; Pollock, Rindova, & Maggitti, 2008), but also what types of market signals are most effective with which audiences.”