Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates
By Herbert Scheithauer, T. Hayer, Franz Petermann, Gert Jugert. 2006
508 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f259d4a0fd1951b09efb25f7a775963d6fa8981
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Debra Pepler
- Wendy Craig
- Simone Manhal
- T. Hayer
- Raúl Béjar Navarro
- Sebastian Wachs
- Verónica Martínez
- P. Hampel
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Gianluca Gini
- Wendy Craig
- Debra Pepler
- Raúl Béjar Navarro
- Sebastian Wachs
- Verónica Martínez
- P. Hampel
- T. Hayer
In Social Psychology
- Wendy Craig
- Debra Pepler
- Gianluca Gini
- Simone Manhal
- T. Hayer
- Raúl Béjar Navarro
- Sebastian Wachs
- Verónica Martínez
Citations in the corpus
- Individual Motivations and Characteristics Associated With Bystander Intervention During Bullying Episodes Among Children and Youth (2012, background): “Consistent with the literature, verbal and social forms of bullying were more common than physical forms, with more than 60% of children witnessing each (Craig & Pepler, 1997; Scheithauer et al., 2006; Woods & White, 2005).”
- Does peer victimization predict low self-esteem, or does low self-esteem predict peer victimization? Meta-analyses on longitudinal studies (2018, background): “Because peer victimization tends to decline as children grow older (Pellegrini & Bartini, 2000; Scheithauer et al., 2006) we expect to find stronger links between self-esteem and peer victimization in studies that consider younger children.”
- Children’s Cyberbullying Victimization: Associations with Social Anxiety and Social Competence in a Spanish Sample (2012, methodology): “A similar procedure to that utilized in studies about bullying behaviors in schools (Scheithauer et al. 2006) was used to determine how often cyberbullying victimization has occurred.”
- The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools (2013, methodology): “Participants’ categorization of victims or non victims of cyberbullying was done by following the criterion used by Scheithauer et al. (2006) for bullying in schools.”
- Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: differences by participant role (2012, background): “Among over 2000 5th to 10th grade students, 12.1% reported being traditional bullies and 11.1% traditional victims (Scheithauer et al. 2006).”
- Direct and Relational Bullying Among Children and Adolescents: Coping and Psychological Adjustment (2009, methodology): “…prevalence rates vary significantly due to methodological reasons such as age, gender, informants (self- or proxy-reports) and instruments, approximately 30 percent of students have been shown to be actively involved in bullying and victimization (Nansel et al., 2001; Scheithauer et al., 2006).”
- “FearNot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention (2011, background): “At the baseline assessment (T1), we found common prevalence rates based on bullying roles peer nomination scales for both countries (see, e.g. for Germany: Scheithauer et al. 2006; for the UK: Whitney and Smith 1993; for the UK and Germany: Wolke et al. 2001), with more UK than German children being”