The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning

By Asher Koriat, H. Ma'ayan. 2005

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model (2011, background): “The tip-of-the-tongue experience (ie, recall of part of the response; Hart, 1965 ), feeling of knowing ( Koriat, 2007 ), as well as judgment of learning ( Dunlonsky et al, 2006 ; Koriat & Ma’ayan, 2005 ) or error detection ( Van Veen & Carter, 2002 ) are other ME based on the monitoring of cogniti”
Judgments of learning: Methods, data, and theory. (2016, background): “Subsequent work has generally confirmed the benefits of delaying judgment (e.g., Dunlosky & Nelson, 1992; 1994; 1997; Kelemen & Weaver, 1997; Koriat & Ma’ayan, 2005; Nelson, et al., 2004).”
Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (2009, unknown): “” Lee and Labroo (2004) similarly manipulated conceptual fluency by asking participants to evaluate consumer products after reading conceptually related or conceptually unrelated advertisements (e.”
How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? An Integrative Approach (2014, background): “The importance of focusing on cues related to retrieval rather than encoding fluency was also shown by Koriat and Ma'ayan (2005).”