THE 2004 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT
By D. Schrank, T. Lomax. 2002
621 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ef5edbc1c2af0f0dcfb646242d7f6107d2127d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Martin W. P. Savelsbergh
- Niels A. H. Agatz
- Kent M. Hymel
- Gonçalo Homem De Almeida Correia
- José Manuel Viegas
- Brian D. Noble
- A. Erera
- David A. Hensher
Citations in the corpus
- Should Automobile Fuel Economy Standards be Tightened? (2007, methodology): “We then inferred values for the mileage/pavement ratio, and hence MCC, for the 75 largest US cities, using data on travel demand and road capacity in Schrank and Lomax (2002).”
- An Incentive Mechanism for Decongesting the Roads : A Pilot Program in Bangalore (2009, background): “Categories and Subject Descriptors J.4 [Social and Behavioral Sciences]: Economics General Terms Algorithms, Economics, Experimentation Keywords Transportation networks, Road congestion, Selfish routing, Congestion charging, Incentive mechanisms”
- Traffic Congestion and Infant Health: Evidence from E-Zpass (2009, unknown): “United States, causing 3.7 billion hours of delay by 2003 and wasting 2.3 billion gallons of motor fuel ( Schrank and Lomax, 2005 ).”
- A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes. (2008, background): “Traffic congestion levels in metropolitan areas of the United States have risen substantially over the past decade (see Schrank and Lomax, 2005).”
- Mass Car Ownership in the Emerging Market Giants (2008, unknown): “sample of 85 US urban areas (Schrank and Lomax, 2005).”
- The Impact of Demographics, Built Environment Attributes, Vehicle Characteristics, and Gasoline Prices on Household Vehicle Holdings and Use (2009, background): “and energy consumption (see Schrank and Lomax, 2005; EPA, 1999; Litman and Laube, 2002;”
- An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US (2009, background): “…has contributed to growing traffic congestion, air quality degradation due to increased mobile source emissions, increased energy consumption, and greater dependency on foreign fuel supplies (see Schrank and Lomax, 2005; EPA, 1999; Litman and Laube, 2002; Jeff et al., 1997; Schipper, 2004).”
- Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal (2011, background): “The continuous rising of car use deriving from urban sprawl and car ownership growth is still making traffic congestion more frequent in urban areas (Bukold et al., 1996; Schrank and Lomax, 2005).”
- Does traffic congestion reduce employment growth (2009, methodology): “The Texas Transportation Institute provides measures of the two most important determinants of congestion— volume (measured in vehicle miles traveled per person) and capacity (measured in freeway lane-miles per person).”
- Suburbanization and transportation in the monocentric model (2007, methodology): “I take the formula for speed on congested highways from the Texas Transportation Institute’s (TTI) 2004 Mobility Report [8] and adapt it slightly to fit this context.8 The formula is estimated by the TTI based on data taken from sampled portions of the highway network.”