Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal

By Gonçalo Homem De Almeida Correia, José Manuel Viegas. 2011

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4da27704504043943db929cfe025d4816e5b9107

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke
2. Caroline E. Leonard
3. Laurie A. Garrow
4. Brian J. German
5. Viktoriya Kolarova
6. Felix Steck

In Marketing

1. Caroline E. Leonard
2. Laurie A. Garrow
3. Brian J. German

In Transportation

1. Anina Hanimann
2. Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke
3. M. Chipulu
4. Caroline E. Leonard
5. A. Marshall
6. Laurie A. Garrow
7. F. Bachmann
8. Brian J. German

Citations in the corpus

• What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis (2017, background): “We try to control for this bias by (i) excluding studies where these confounders are present (such as in Giuliano Table 1 Selected studies for meta-analysis Ref Study N Study outcomes and details Carpoolers in the study Location 1 Abrahamse and Keall (2012) 634 Retrospective self-reported commute mo”
• What drives people to carpool? Explaining carpooling intention from the perspectives of carpooling passengers and drivers (2018, background): “…studies have focused on psychological factors such as psychological barriers associated with riding with strangers, poor schedule flexibility, or sociable travel (Abrahamse & Keall, 2012; Becker, Ciari, & Axhausen, 2017; Correia & Viegas, 2011; de Almeida Correia, de Abreu e Silva, & Viegas, 2013).”
• Assessing the effect of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings: A comparison between current and future preferences (2019, background): “These differences might be partly related to psychological barriers associated with sharing a ride with strangers as such acceptance issues were found in early studies on carpooling service (e.g., Correia and Viegas, 2011).”
• Urban air mobility: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis with autonomous and electric ground transportation for informing future research (2021, background): “…a shared autonomous vehicle alone and sharing the journey are perceived as two distinct mobility options (Krueger et al., 2016), which may be due to psychological barriers or discriminatory attitudes associated with sharing a ride with a stranger (Correia and Viegas 2011; Middleton and Zhao, 2019).”