Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum

By Bianka Malecka, David Boud, D. Carless. Teaching in Higher Education, 2020

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT Recent feedback literature suggests that the development of student feedback literacy has potential to address problems in current feedback practice. Students’ feedback literacy involves developing the capacity to make the most of feedback opportunities by active involvement in feedback processes. How the development of student feedback literacy can be embedded within the undergraduate curriculum has not yet been discussed in any depth. This conceptual paper fills that gap by elaborating three key mechanisms for embedding feedback literacy within the curriculum: eliciting, processing and enacting. These are illustrated through enhanced variations of four existing practices: feedback requests, self-assessment, peer review, and curated e-portfolios. The discussion summarizes the key implications for practice and identifies the need for further empirical work investigating how students elicit, process and enact feedback in situ, and longitudinal research exploring the impact of curriculum design on the development of student feedback literacy.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ebf2c4b21b4c99562c6cc993e143d1b91183ddc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Phillip Dawson
  2. Hui-Teng Hoo
  3. Christopher C. Deneen
  4. David Boud
  5. D. Carless
  6. Emma Medland
  7. David J. Nicol
  8. R. Warhurst

Citations in the corpus