The Dynamic Influence of Social Capital on the International Growth of New Ventures

By S. Prashantham, C. Dhanaraj. 2010

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d79d28800d738016226759e8f7d89f72be99bb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

An Effectual Approach to International Entrepreneurship: Overlaps, Challenges, and Provocative Possibilities (2014, unknown): “…matters more than the attributes of resources themselves—resolves the theoretical conflict between the quantity versus the quality (fungibility) of resources being necessary conditions for early and rapid internationalization (Prashantham & Dhanaraj, 2010; Yli-Renko, Autio, & Tontti, 2002).”
Social capital in relation to the foreign market entry and post-entry operations of family SMEs (2011, background): “For instance, it seems that some firms (from China, India, Vietnam, etc.) are able to take advantage of their emigrant relationships around the world (Bagwell 2008; Child et al. 2002; Prashantham and Dhanaraj 2010).”
Technological Innovation and Exports: Unpacking Their Reciprocal Causality (2013, background): “However, failing to articulate, identify, and capture the international and technological learning available to firms represents a significant missed opportunity (Prashantham and Dhanaraj 2010).”
International commitment, post-entry growth and survival of international new ventures (2014, background): “In contrast, active learning and networking across countries are more typical and have been more often found in cases that describe the rapid development of INVs (Coviello, 2006; Prashantham and Dhanaraj, 2010).”
Re-thinking research on born globals (2015, unknown): “Likewise, networks, ties and social capital receive much attention (Coviello & Munro 1997; Ellis, 2011; Prashantham & Dhanaraj, 2010; Yli-Renko, Autio, & Tontti, 2002).”
Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research (2014, background): “By developing viable relationships with external groups, new ventures are able to gain social capital (Prashntham and Dhanaraj, 2010).”
International entrepreneurship: A critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research (2012, background): “…efficacy and liability) in reducing uncertainty in the international market (Yli-Renko et al. 2002; Chetty and Agndal 2007; Agndal et al. 2008; Tuppura et al. 2008; Musteen et al. 2010; Prashantham and Dhanaraj 2010; Kontinen and Ojala 2011; Prashantham and Young 2011; Evald et al. 2011).”
Collaboration and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights and Recommendations from a Systematic Review (2020, methodology): “Finally, international growth has been utilized as a way of understanding the international development of SMEs over time, being conceptualized as an increase in foreign sales (Prashantham and Dhanaraj 2010; Zhou et al. 2010), increase in the number of countries served (Coviello and Munro 1997), and”
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities (2015, background): “In addition, Prashantham and Dhanaraj (2010) found that in three out of four new ventures in the Bangalore software industry, entrepreneurs’ preexisting social relationships in the United States and in U.S. multinational firms facilitated geographic diversification in the form of entry into the…”
Micro-multinational or not? International entrepreneurship, networking and learning effects (2014, background): “Entrepreneurial firms that seek and exploit learning opportunities through networks enjoy significant international growth (Prashantham & Dhanaraj, 2010).”
Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success (2017, background): “If no longer activated, they weaken and ultimately decay (Prashantham & Dhanaraj, 2010).”
Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process (2013, background): “Prashantham and Dhanaraj (2010) focus on the role of social capital in the international growth of new ventures.”
LINKING THEORY AND CONTEXT: "STRATEGY RESEARCH IN EMERGING ECONOMIES" AFTER WRIGHT ET AL. (2005) (2012, unknown): “For instance, Elango and Pattnaik (2007) and Prashantham and Dhanaraj (2010) document how international networks helped small and young Indian firms to build capabilities in their internationalization process.”