Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: An International Analysis
By C. Ho. 2005
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ca91b9022fa55d88b0fd805b7197f2837bf6f19
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- M. Rabbath
- Asem M. Safieddine
- William Q. Judge
- Thomas J. Douglas
- L. Rodríguez
- A. García
- M. López
- Dima Jamali
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Rabbath
- Asem M. Safieddine
- William Q. Judge
- Thomas J. Douglas
- L. Rodríguez
- A. García
- M. López
- Dima Jamali
In Strategy and Management
- Dima Jamali
- M. Rabbath
- Asem M. Safieddine
- William Q. Judge
- Thomas J. Douglas
- L. Rodríguez
- A. García
- M. López
Citations in the corpus
- Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (2007, methodology): “The model proposed includes PBT as a dependent variable (Ho, 2005) and revenue (REV) and CSR as independent variables.”
- Institutional Antecedents of Corporate Governance Legitimacy (2008, methodology): “For example, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development found that nations that were less globally competitive usually supported less effective corporate governance practices (Cornelius, 2005). Furthermore, Ho (2005) demonstrated a positive association between cultural norms of compe”
- Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships (2008, background): “This is consistent with the writings of other authors (e.g., Kendall, 1999; OECD, 1999), who also consider CSR as an integral part of CG. Ho (2005) proposes through this framework to gauge CG more holistically by considering a range of relevant attributes, including CSR.”
- Bundles of Firm Corporate Governance Practices: A Fuzzy Set Analysis (2013, unknown): “Before (Model 2) and after (Model 1) controlling for firm size, country, industry, and debt-equity ratio, we find no significant individual effect at conventional levels for any of the six CG practices, confirming previous studies of mixed findings regarding the relationship between individual CG pr”