Support for Harsh Criminal Sanctions and Criminal Justice Beliefs: A Social Dominance Perspective

By J. Sidanius, Michael Mitchell, H. Haley, C. David Navarrete. 2006

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b36d639b7fdf93787219d7d7ceb7bd7b21024aad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Ho
2. Monica M. Gerber
3. J. Jackson
4. Nour S. Kteily
5. J. Sidanius

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nour S. Kteily
2. A. Ho
3. J. Sidanius
4. Monica M. Gerber
5. J. Jackson
6. Emily Gray
7. Stephen Farrall
8. Tom Tyler

Citations in the corpus

• Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains (2012, background): “and benevolent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 1996), pro-war attitudes (Sidanius & Liu, 1992), support for the persecution of immigrants (POSSE; Altemeyer, 1996; adapted by Thomsen, Green, & Sidanius, 2008), support for the death penalty (Sidanius, Mitchell, Haley, & Navarrete, 2006), punitiveness (Sidanius”
• Retribution as Revenge and Retribution as Just Deserts (2013, background): “In fact, SDO has been linked to the support for harsh criminal sanctions (Sidanius et al., 2006), retribution (Pratto et al., 1994) and personal vengeance (McKee & Feather, 2008).”