Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice

By J. Duckitt, Chris G. Sibley. 2007

515 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8286e5baf24c20ce4d511dc789f46bc67e804a20

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test (2010, methodology): “We revised this initial scale to, in our opinion, more clearly and accurately represent each of these three types of groups theorized by Duckitt and Sibley (2007).”
Cognitive ability and authoritarianism: Understanding support for Trump and Clinton (2017, background): “Consequently, higher RWAs hold negative attitudes toward outgroups deemed socially threatening and support policies that seek to preserve social order and control (Duckitt & Sibley, 2007).”
A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice (2009, background): “In the first study an exploratory factor analysis of attitudes to 24 different social outgroups revealed three distinct outgroup attitude dimensions ( Duckitt & Sibley, 2007 ).”
Is Sexism a Gender Issue? A Motivated Social Cognition Perspective on Men's and Women's Sexist Attitudes toward Own and Other Gender (2012, result): “through the endorsement of social attitudes that have been well-established as proximal determinants of general prejudice (see, Duckitt & Sibley, 2007). Moreover, the present findings also attest to the idea that in addition to different worldviews lying at the basis of RWA and SDO (see e.g., Duckit”
Speaking (Un–)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as A Generalised Political Attitude (2014, background): “Although numerous studies observed independent contributions of RWA and SDO to prejudicial attitudes (e.g. Akrami, Ekehammar, & Yang-Wallentin, 2011; Duckitt & Sibley, 2007; Duckitt, Wagner, du Plessis, & Birum, 2002), these studies usually examined sexism or prejudice against disadvantaged,…”
Authoritarianism, Threat, and Prejudice: An Analysis of Mediation and Moderation (2009, background): “RWA predicted prejudice against groups culturally stereotyped as threatening (e.g., drug dealers, rock stars), but not against groups culturally stereotyped as socially subordinate (e.g., housewives, physically disabled) (Duckitt, 2006; see also Duckitt & Sibley, 2007).”
When Women Become More Hostilely Sexist toward their Gender: The System-Justifying Effect of Benevolent Sexism (2007, background): “subjugate derogated outgroups, that is, groups that are seen as weaker or inferior, or at least those that people high in SDO think should be ( Duckitt and Sibley 2007b; Sibley et al. 2006).”
Intergroup bias toward “Group X”: Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals (2012, background): “Especially strong correlations exist when groups share some commonality (Duckitt & Sibley, 2007).”
Gender-Inclusive Bathrooms Signal Fairness Across Identity Dimensions (2018, background): “Essentialism thus serves as an underlying ideology for negative attitudes toward multiple stigmatized groups (i.e., generalized prejudice; Bastian & Haslam, 2006; Duckitt & Sibley, 2007).”
Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Differentially Moderate Intergroup Effects on Prejudice (2010, background): “24: 583–601 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/per prejudice against groups apparently low in status andpower, ordeviant groups that challenged existing social inequalities (Duckitt, 2006; Duckitt & Sibley, 2007).”
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “In a student sample from New Zealand, Duckitt and Sibley (2007) have identified correlated but distinct subdimensions of generalised prejudice: derogated groups (e.g., mentally handicapped, Africans), dangerous groups (e.g., terrorists, drug dealers), and dissident groups (e.g., protesters, feminist”
Personality and Prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO Personality Model (2010, background): “Duckitt and Sibley (2007) deliberately excluded common ethnic groups that tend to be recipients of prejudice in the more traditional sense (such as attitudes towards Maori in the New Zealand context) from their generalized prejudice scale precisely because prejudice towards ethnic groups tends to…”