Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality

By Melissa Patchan, Christian D. Schunn. Instructional Science, 2015

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2afde63afd0e2c30064f71399c4c58f2ab491b53

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Melissa Patchan
2. Christian D. Schunn
3. Nadira Saab
4. J. V. van Driel
5. P. W. van den Broek
6. Bart Huisman
7. Richard Correnti
8. Yong Wu

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2018, background): “The act of providing peer feedback also requires students to actively (re)consider the assignment criteria, which may improve their own subsequent writing performance (Flower et al. 1986; Patchan and Schunn 2015).”
• The Nature of Feedback: How Peer Feedback Features Affect Students' Implementation Rate and Quality of Revisions. (2016, background): “…learn from peer assessment, including the benefits for the author of receiving feedback (Patchan & Schunn, in press) and the benefits for the reviewer of providing feedback (Patchan & Schunn, 2015), in contrast to the current focus on the relative effectiveness of different forms of peer feedback.”