Marginal Mentoring: The Effects Of Type Of Mentor, Quality Of Relationship, And Program Design On Work And Career Attitudes
By B. R. Ragins, John L. Cotton, Janice S. Miller. 2000
1,067 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a583f2b4c1887c41ad23e6496ef6296a6c0feb2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. Eby
- Tammy D. Allen
- Dawn Chandler
- Ans De Vos
- K. Kram
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Connie R. Wanberg
- Michael E. Brown
Citations in the corpus
- Are Bad Experiences Stronger than Good Ones in Mentoring Relationships? Evidence from the Protege and Mentor Perspective. (2010, background): “For example, one of the most strongly supported theories of close relationships, Rusbult (1980) investment model, finds that relationship satisfaction is a direct function of the costs (i.”
- Knowledge sharing and the psychological contract: Managing knowledge workers across different stages of employment (2007, unknown): “Although formal mentoring relationships are not usually as effective as spontaneous, informal ones made between parties (Ragins et al ., 2000; Ragins and Cotton, 1999), providing opportunities for input into the mentor-protégé match may increase commitment from both parties, thus further enhancing…”
- Mentoring Relationships From the Perspective of the Mentor (2007, background): “crucial to the success of formal mentoring programs within organizations (Allen, Eby, & Lentz, 2006b; Allen & Poteet, 1999; Ragins, Cotton, & Miller, 2000 ).”