Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing

472 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metacognition About Practice Testing: a Review of Learners’ Beliefs, Monitoring, and Control of Test-Enhanced Learning (2020, background): “Quantitative reviews investigating the effects of testing on memory performance have revealed that the advantages of testing are moderated by characteristics of the learner, the learning material, and test type (e.g., Adesope et al. 2017; Phelps 2019; Rowland 2014).”
Keep it Coherent: A Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Details Effect (2020, methodology): “Our approach to conducting a meta-analysis is consistent with well-established review protocols, applying the following procedures to the collection and synthesis of research (Nesbit and Adesope 2006; Adesope et al. 2017; Cooper et al. 2009; Lipsey and Wilson 2001).”