Adoption of Mobile Internet Services: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Commerce Early Adopters

By Per E. Pedersen. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2005

533 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29eaa8c497bff68cdd705700b07fcc8db1f647a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Media Technology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce (2006, background): “Pedersen [72] extended TAM with subjective norms and behavioral control into a decomposed theory of planned behavior for early adopters of mobile commerce services.”
Factors affecting e-commerce adoption among SMEs in Ghana (2016, background): “According to Pedersen (2003), self-efficacy in the context of technology adoption can be viewed as confidence in one’s ability to use an innovation to achieve a desired behaviour.”
An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models (2008, background): “Mobile services are adopted for both functional and nonfunctional reasons [27].”
The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services (2009, background): “In particular, innovators have been found to be early adopters of wireless applications [57].”
Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications (2010, background): “…payment) rather than experiential services (contact and gaming) Thorbjørsen et al. (2007) report a positive significant effect of behavioural control on people’s intention to use MMS (multimedia messaging service), while Pedersen (2005) does the same for the acceptance of mobile commerce services.”
Moderating effects of Job Relevance and Experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals (2008, background): “Pedersen [19] added subjective norm and behavioral control to examine the reliability of TAM in analyzing mobile wireless service, adding a subjective norm and behavioral control; however, only the former had a significant effect on intention to use.”
Mobile banking: proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework (2010, methodology): “Literature review There is a growing interest in studying the adoption of mobile banking (Brown et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2003; Suoranta and Mattila, 2004; Laforet and Li, 2005; Luarn and Lin, 2005; Pedersen, 2005; Sulaiman et al., 2007; Laukkanen et al., 2008), but literature on the subject is stil”
Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study (2008, methodology): “The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposes a number of factors that are essential in determining user attitude towards accepting a new technology, as shown in Figure 1 [9, 21], TAM incorporates six distinct factors [9, 24]:”
The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing (2011, background): “As mobile devices and mobile applications have become part of young people's daily routines [50], we believed that the use of university students as potential LAM users was appropriate.”
A Model of Green Consumption Behavior Constructed by the Theory of Planned Behavior (2014, background): “Resource limitation refers to the availability of resources (Pedersen, 2005), while self-efficacy refers to one’s belief in one’s own competence（Bandura, 1997.”
The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on potential and experienced customers’ adoption of location-based services (2009, background): “research indicates that younger individuals are among the most avid users of mobile technologies (Pedersen 2005), and arguably, represent the next generation of mobile consumers.”
An investigation of consumer acceptance of M-Banking in Australia (2010, background): “This study also builds on the body of research which has found a significant positive relationship between attitude and intention (e.g. Bouwman, Carlsson, Molina-Castillo and Walden, 2007; Curran and Meuter, 2005; Nysveen, Pedersen and Thorbornsen, 2005; Pedersen, 2005) given that the standardised p”