Group Loyalty: Impact of Members' Identification and Contributions

By B. Zdaniuk, John M. Levine. 2001

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2954e53b81288b2718af4b1ea7023ba8f4f8d28e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Jonathan Hildreth
2. Francesca Gino
3. Max H. Bazerman
4. Lindsey Cameron

In Social Psychology

1. A. Rutland
2. Lindsey Cameron
3. Francesca Gino
4. Max H. Bazerman
5. Dominic Abrams
6. Jonathan Hildreth
7. J. Marques
8. Miles Hewstone

Citations in the corpus

• Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it (2016, methodology): “Nonetheless, most definitions of loyalty do not reference its moral aspect (e.g., Dooley & Fryxell, 1999; Hirschman, 1970; Mele, 2001; Powers, 2000; Zdaniuk & Levine, 2001; although, see Allport, 1933; Coughlan, 2005; and Oldenquist, 1982 for exceptions).”
• Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. (2009, unknown): “…been linked to in-group-favoring actions (Brewer, 1979; Tajfel, Billig, Bundy, & Flament, 1971), collective actions (Blader, 2007c; Kelly & Kelly, 1994), monetary donations (Mael & Ashforth, 1992), and loyalty (Abrams, Ando, & Hinkle, 1998; Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 1997; Zdaniuk & Levine, 2001).”
• The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific (2003, background): “Nevertheless, the same behaviour may have different implications if directed toward in-group versus out-group members (Abrams, Marques, Bown, & Dougill, 2002; Zdaniuk & Levine, 2001).”