Building classroom community at a distance: A case study
By Alfred P. Rovai. 2001
485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27713f1534073b5d2f016af713315c6952d01f8f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Traci Sitzmann
- Kurt Kraiger
- J. Ben Arbaugh
- Steve Chi-Yin Yuen
- Hsiu-Ting Hung
- David Stewart
- Robert A. Wisher
- R. Ferdig
In Education
- J. Ben Arbaugh
- Traci Sitzmann
- Hsiu-Ting Hung
- Steve Chi-Yin Yuen
- Stanley D. Sibley
- R. B. Marks
- Alfred P. Rovai
- Kurt Kraiger
In General Health Professions
- J. Ben Arbaugh
- Steve Chi-Yin Yuen
- Hsiu-Ting Hung
- Stanley D. Sibley
- R. B. Marks
- Kurt Kraiger
- D. Randy Garrison
- Shane Dawson
Citations in the corpus
- Development of an instrument to measure classroom community (2002, background): “Both Blum (1999) and Rovai (2001) conducted studies in online learning environments and reported finding a difference in sense of community by gender, with females manifesting stronger sense of community than males.”
- THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: (2006, background): “One of the demonstrated advantages of WBI is the opportunity to develop collaborative learning communities (e.g., Alavi, Wheeler, & Valacich, 1995; Rovai, 2001), but it takes learners time to build and ben-efit from collaborative contexts (Duffy & Kirkley, 2004; Garrison, 2003).”
- A Structural Equation Model of Predictors for Effective Online Learning (2005, background): “Therefore, these behaviors often are demonstrated via text-based messaging or emoticons (Gains, 1999; Poole, 2000; Rovai, 2001; Wang, Sierra, & Folger, 2003).”
- A sense of belonging to enhance participation, success and retention in online programs (2014, background): “Rovai (2001) suggested two types of online interactions for the purpose of building online community: task‐driven interactions for the goal of learning and, socioemotional interactions to facilitate social‐wellbeing and friendships.”
- Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks (2002, result): “Rovai (2001) also found similar gender differences in his case study of sense of community and gender-related communication patterns of university students enrolled in an ALN course and found evidence to support the hypothesis that students with the connected voice tend to have stronger feelings of…”
- The College Classroom as a Community: Impact on Student Attitudes and Learning (2006, background): “Recent work by Rovai (2001), for example, has explored the communities of students in so-called “asynchronous learning network” (ALN) courses, a form of distance learning that makes intense use of computer and learning technologies for students who interact over telecommunication systems, but not…”
- Educational use of social networking technology in higher education (2010, background): “According to Rovai (2001, 287), a classroom community is ‘a specific type of psychological community based on the following characteristics: (a) the setting is the world of education; (b) the primary purpose is learning; and (c) the community is based on a fixed organizational tenure, that is, a…”
- Virtual Schooling Standards and Best Practices for Teacher Education (2009, background): “that draw on and integrate the available telecommunication tools to support student collaboration and knowledge acquisition (Rovai, 2001; Swan et al., 2000).”
- In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs (2003, background): “Rovai (2001) found similar gender-related differences in an online course and explained them as differences in communication patterns and sense of community.”
- Is There an Optimal Design for On-Line MBA Courses? (2005, background): “Because of their potential confounding effects in previous studies of Web-based courses (Arbaugh, 2000b, 2000c; Barrett & Lally, 1999; Benbunan-Fich & Hiltz, 2002; Rovai, 2001; Wang & Newlin, 2000), I controlled for student age, gender, course Website usage, and student prior experience with Webbase”