Faking of the Implicit Association Test Is Statistically Detectable and Partly Correctable

By Dario Cvencek, A. Greenwald, A. S. Brown, N. Gray, R. Snowden. 2010

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcba5ae13f671d2f8d2d8c58e94ff2a151cbf5cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Mahzarin R. Banaji
2. A. Greenwald
3. Brian A. Nosek
4. E. Uhlmann
5. Andrew Poehlmann
6. Efrén O. Pérez
7. John F. Dovidio
8. A. Eagly

In Social Psychology

1. Mahzarin R. Banaji
2. A. Greenwald
3. E. Uhlmann
4. Brian A. Nosek
5. Andrew Poehlmann
6. Efrén O. Pérez
7. Nilanjana Dasgupta
8. Bertram Gawronski

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mahzarin R. Banaji
2. A. Greenwald
3. Brian A. Nosek
4. E. Uhlmann
5. Andrew Poehlmann
6. Efrén O. Pérez
7. Bertram Gawronski
8. Nilanjana Dasgupta

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. (2009, background): “At the same time, most naive subjects do not spontaneously discover this strategy (Cvencek, Greenwald, Brown, Gray, & Snowden, 2008; Kim, 2003; Steffens, 2004; but cf.”