Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification.
By R. Kark, Ronit Waismel-Manor, Boas Shamir. 2012
268 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/267507ad2e5e66d3284be3d1490c0cdcf8367ed0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- “I Identify with Her,” “I Identify with Him”: Unpacking the Dynamics of Personal Identification in Organizations (2016, background): “, 2003; Wang & Howell, 2012; Zhu, Wang, Zhen, Liu, & Miao, 2013), androgynous leadership (where leaders blend stereotypically agentic-masculine and communal-feminine behaviors; Kark et al., 2012), and the leadermatching one’s ideal leader prototype (van Quaquebeke, Graf, & Eckloff, 2014) may have ca”
- Are (male) leaders feminine enough? Gendered traits of identity as mediators of sex differences in leadership styles (2012, background): “leaders who identify with both instrumental and expressive traits) are the most effective in terms of their use of individualized consideration, contingent rewards and EI leadership behaviours (Gartzia, 2010; Kark et al., 2011; Korabik, 1982, 1990; Powell and Butterfield, 1979).”