Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.

By Dario Sambunjak, Sharon E. Straus, Ana Marusic. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2006

1,581 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/233175d0bebd07e95cbdefc8ec7df554d7092b17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Thomas W. H. Ng
2. Tammy D. Allen
3. L. Eby
4. Edward Palmer
5. A. Darwin
6. A. Stewart
7. J. Malley
8. Nicola Curtin

In Social Psychology

1. L. Eby
2. Tammy D. Allen
3. Thomas W. H. Ng
4. Sarah Evans
5. D. DuBois
6. Stine Thidemann Faber
7. Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt
8. Edward Palmer

Citations in the corpus

• An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. (2013, neutral): “…reviews (e.g., T. D. Allen et al., 2004; Dorsey & Baker, 2004; DuBois et al., 2002; Underhill, 2006), narrative reviews (e.g., Jacobi, 1991; Sambunjak et al., 2006; Wanberg et al., 2003), and other major compendiums (e.g., T. D. Allen & Eby, 2007; DuBois & Karcher, 2005) to identify…”
• Mentoring circles in higher education (2009, background): “Studies (Burke & McKeen, 1997; Sambunjak et al., 2006) showed that one of the main functions of mentoring has been career development and this was the initial motivation for participants for joining the circles.”
• Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students (2016, result): “While some research has shown relatively small effects of mentoring and raised concerns that additional empirical support for its efficacy is needed (Sambunjak et al. 2006), other analyses (Eby et al.”
• Benefits of Peer Mentoring to Mentors, Female Mentees and Higher Education Institutions (2016, background): “In a systematic review of mentoring in academic medicine, Sambunjak, Straus, and Marušić (2006) concluded that mentorship has an “important influence on personal development, career guidance, career choice, and productivity” (p. 1,113) Likewise, Farrell, Digioia, Broderick, and Coates (2004) found…”
• A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research on the Meaning and Characteristics of Mentoring in Academic Medicine (2009, background): “academic medicine, mentoring was recognized as a crucial developmental relationship,(7) and our recent systematic review showed that mentoring has an important influence on personal development, career guidance, career choice and research productivity.(8) The review we initially performed(8) include”
• Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals. (2008, positive): “Reviews of youth (DuBois et al., 2002) and academic (Sambunjak et al., 2006) mentoring found an association between mentoring and both career and employment outcomes.”