Potential Benefits of Communication in Transactive Memory Systems

By Andrea B. Hollingshead, David P. Brandon. 2003

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22a7861af8a514632b8fae39ba6d8c9693f77d76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Vesa Peltokorpi
2. Mark O. Riedl
3. Upol Ehsan

In Information Systems and Management

1. Vesa Peltokorpi
2. Linda Argote
3. Yuqing Ren
4. Michael J. Muller
5. Rajeev Sharma
6. Q. Liao
7. Justin D. Weisz
8. Paul M. Leonardi

In Social Psychology

1. Vesa Peltokorpi
2. Linda Argote
3. Yuqing Ren
4. David P. Brandon
5. Andrea B. Hollingshead
6. Rajeev Sharma
7. Philip Yetton
8. Michael J. Muller

Citations in the corpus

• The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation (2007, background): “As noted above, groups have been found to perform better on interdependent tasks when group members have shared knowledge about the skills and knowledge of each member (Hollingshead and Brandon 2003).”
• Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People (2004, background): “Direct interpersonal communication is likely, but is not necessary, for members to learn about other group mem- bers’ areas of expertise (Hollingshead and Brandon 2003, Moreland and Myaskovsky 2000).”
• Transactive Memory Systems 1985–2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences (2011, background): “Nine of the conceptual papers focused on describing the working of TMS, including the two papers by Wegner (1987, 1995), or the development of TMS as a result of cognitive interdependence (Brandon & Hollingshead, 2004), communication (Hollingshead & Brandon, 2003) or affect (Huang, 2009).”
• Transactive Memory Systems (2008, background): “As a response, only well-functioning TMS have been argued to allow groups to know the knowledge of their members (Hollingshead & Brandon, 2003; Wittenbaum, 2003), suggesting that group members need to be both interdependent and motivated to learn what others know.”
• Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems (2021, background): “(P28-NS) A TMS could also facilitate a peer-to-peer support system that gives employees a sense of community: What I really love is the support system you can potentially create over time using ST.”