AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
By Christopher L. Shook, Dave J. Ketchen, G. Tomas M. Hult, K. Kacmar. 2004
915 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21ee5c7d61382955d5cc9f454e4331d19df2574b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Jörg Henseler
- Joseph F. Hair
- Robin Nunkoo
- Detmar W. Straub Jr.
- Haywantee Ramkissoon
- D. Gursoy
In Strategy and Management
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Joseph F. Hair
- David Urbano
- Jörg Henseler
- Maribel Guerrero
- Dave J. Ketchen
- Abraham Carmeli
Citations in the corpus
- Economic Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities' Activities: An Exploratory Study of the United Kingdom (2015, methodology): “Furthermore, the construct satisfied the parameters of reliability and convergent analysis suggested by Shook et al. (2004) 5 .”
- How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification (2011, methodology): “Sluss and Ashforth (2008) argued that relational identification between individuals (such as leaders and followers) may extend to other types of identification such as organizational identification.”
- The Role of Formative Measurement Models in Strategic Management Research: Review, Critique, and Implications for Future Research (2006, background): “, 2005) or less than ideal (Shook et al., 2004), the increasing use of multiple-item scales in construct measurement is nevertheless a welcome development in strategic management research.”
- Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling (2012, background): “Researchers have embraced the advantages of SEM, which include its abilities to model latent variables, to account for measurement error (Bagozzi and Phillips 1982), and to test a series of dependence relationships simultaneously (Shook et al. 2004).”
- Transformational Leadership's Role in Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT Interface (2008, neutral): “…to test our model's hypotheses because SEM allows estimation of multiple associations, simultaneously incorporates observed and latent constructs in these associations, and accounts for the biasing effects of random measurement error in the latent constructs (Shook, Ketchen, Hult, & Kacmar, 2004).”
- Why Don't We Use the Same Export Barrier Measurement Scale? An Empirical Analysis in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (2010, background): “The aim was to reflect the full complexity of the relationships between the determining factors (Shook et al. 2004).”
- Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance (2012, methodology): “The theoretical model illustrated in Figure 1 was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) (with EQS software package), which offers a powerful methodological framework that allows researchers to address causal research questions for both observed and latent variables (Shook et al., 2004; Han”