Antecedents to boundary‐spanner perceived organizational support

By Mark C. Johlke, Christina L. Stamper, Mary E. Shoemaker. 2002

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21a02454e3fb38e870cd88ea9ced88a1052f99b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Yoav Ganzach

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Yoav Ganzach
2. A. Pazy

Citations in the corpus

• Pay Contingency and the Effects of Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support on Performance and Commitment (2009, background): “Moreover, because of associations between pay contingency and POS (e.g., Eisenberger, Rhoades, et al., 1999; Johlke et al., 2002; Miceli & Mulvey, 2000), and the complex effects of pay contingency on performance (e.g., Beersma et al., 2003; Jenkins et al., 1998), an experimental design is…”
• Perceived organizational support and embeddedness as key mechanisms connecting socialization tactics to commitment and turnover among new employees (2013, unknown): “…as discretionary treatment by the organization which signals a willingness to treat the employee as deserving of investment (e.g., Johlke, Stamper, & Shoemaker, 2002) and have been shown to relate positively to POS (e.g., Allen et al., 2003; Johlke et al., 2002;Wayne, Shore, & Liden, 1997).”