Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts

By P. Gillaerts, F. Velde. 2010

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/218a3804f1b238da468ddf922decb93964dc559d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Ken Hyland
2. Douglas Biber
3. Jim McKinley
4. Shih-Chieh Chien
5. A. Molino
6. R. Ruegg
7. Shulin Yu
8. Raffaella Negretti

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Ken Hyland
2. Raffaella Negretti
3. Douglas Biber
4. A. Molino
5. Jim McKinley
6. Shih-Chieh Chien
7. Paul Thompson
8. R. Ruegg

In Philosophy

1. Ken Hyland

Citations in the corpus

• Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? (2017, background): “At this end of the cline, then, metadiscourse seeks to capture something of the interactive character of communication, as suggested by Hyland's (2005) adaptation of Thompson's (2001) distinction between interactive and interactional resources.”